The 3 Minute Thesis Competition
An 80,000 word Ph.D. thesis would take 9 hours to present. Their time limit...3 minutes.
Three Minute Thesis (3MT®) celebrates the exciting research conducted by PhD students around the world. Developed by The University of Queensland (UQ), the competition cultivates students’ academic, presentation, and research communication skills. Presenting in a 3MT competition increases their capacity to effectively explain their research in three minutes, in a language appropriate to a non-specialist audience. Competitors are allowed one PowerPoint slide, but no other resources or props.
This is the second year we’re holding our annual 3-Minute Thesis competition via Zoom, where we’ll watch 3MT presentations and choose winners with the help of our guest judges. To help students prepare for the 3MT we offer a 6-part workshop series that will guide students through the whole process-- developing the talk, creating the slide, and practicing the presentation. Learn more about each session here and find out about dates and registration for the competition here.
The Graduate School faciliates a six-part workshop series designed to help prepare you for the 3MT competition. From brainstorming your presentation content to honing your public speaking skills, these workshops guide you through all the necessary steps for a successful 3MT. Read more about each workshop here. See this semester's schedule and register here.
2020 - See all participants here
- 1st place: Jordan Pierce, MS Oceanography
- 2nd place: Allison Giannotti, PhD Composition & Rhetoric
- 3rd place: Isaiah Paolo Atienza Lee, PhD Molecular and Evolutionary Systems Biology
- People’s Choice Award: Danial Mirzaiyanrajeh, PhD Civil & Environmental Engineering
- People’s Choice Runner Up: Kerry Dykens, MS Oceanography
- 1st place: Sidney Birch, PhD Molecular & Evolutionary Systems Biology
- 2nd place & People’s Choice Award: Zane Relethford, PhD Chemistry
- 3rd place: Katherine Ineson, PhD NRESS
- 1st place: Jovana Milosavljevic Ardeljan, PhD Education
- 2nd place: Devon O'Rourke, PhD Molecular and Evolution Systems Biology
- 3rd place & People’s Choice Award: Kaitlyn Belknap, M.S. Genetics
- 1st place: Drummond Biles, PhD, Mechanical Engineering
- 2nd place: Meagan Wengrove, PhD Ocean Engineering
- 3rd place: Ryan Stevens, PhD Natural resources
- People’s Choice Award: Rev. Holland Prior, MFA Creative Nonfiction
- People’s Choice Runner Up: Jovana Milosavljevic Ardeljan, PhD Education
2021 3MT Practice Round:
- Who: Open to all graduate students
- When: 4-6pm March 18, 2021
- Where: Zoom
- Registration: March 1
2021 3MT First Round:
- Who: Open to all graduate students (spaces limited)
- When: 3-5pm March 30 and 31
- Where: Zoom
- Registration: Closes March 15
- Note: Students must be available for one of the first round dates as well as the final round
2021 3MT Final Round:
- Who: Top 12 students from first round advance
- When: 3-5 p.m. April 21
- Where: Zoom
- A single static PowerPoint slide is permitted. No slide transitions, animations, or "movement" of any description are allowed. The slide is to be presented from the beginning of the oration.
- No additional electronic media (e.g., sound and video files) are permitted.
- No additional props (e.g., costumes, musical instruments, laboratory equipment, etc.) are permitted.
- Presentations are limited to 3 minutes maximum and competitors exceeding 3 minutes are disqualified.
- Presentations are to be spoken word (e.g., no poems, raps or songs).
- Presentations are to commence from the front of the theater.
- Presentations are considered to have commenced when a presenter starts their presentation through either movement or speech.
- The decision of the adjudicating panel is final.
3 Minute Thesis presentations are judged using the following criteria:
Comprehension and Content
- Did the presentation provide an understanding of the background to the research question being addressed and its significance?
- Did the presentation clearly describe the key results of the research including conclusions and outcomes?
- Did the presentation follow a clear and logical sequence?
- Was the thesis topic, key results and research significance and outcomes communicated in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience?
- Did the speaker avoid scientific jargon, explain terminology and provide adequate background information to illustrate points?
- Did the presenter spend adequate time on each element of their presentation - or did they elaborate for too long on one aspect so that other aspects of the presentation felt rushed?
Engagement and Communication
- Did the oration make the audience want to know more?
- Was the presenter careful not to trivialize or generalize their research?
- Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for their research?
- Did the presenter capture and maintain their audience's attention?
- Did the speaker have sufficient stage presence, eye contact and vocal range; maintain a steady pace, and have a confident stance?
- Did the PowerPoint slide enhance the presentation - was it clear, legible, and concise?